| Plan for safe, integrated use |
Carts, bicycles and other slow-moving vehicles should not be prohibited, but allocated special lanes or routes. |
![]() Sign prohibiting slow vehicles, Hungary |
Transport planners should recognise the value of local transport solutions and plan for their integration and safe use. |
| |
||
|
Many laden carts, cycles and
motor vehicles are dangerous. Owners maximise usage. Investment in safety is
not their priority. Legislation for improved safety may be needed. This should
be developed through participative discussions with the users of the
technologies to identify problems and solutions. Photo
right: Motorcycle with bulky load, Sri Lanka |
Prohibition or planning for mixed traffic? Drivers of motor vehicles often consider intermediate means of transport to be dangerous nuisances. They want them banned from towns and from rural roads. They do not understand how important rural roads are for short-distance local transport. The combination of fast traffic and slow-moving means of transport can be dangerous. Solutions may include traffic-calming measures or special lanes for slow vehicles. Some urban authorities have banned carts and rickshaws from city centres, for reasons of safety or improved traffic flows or as a matter of prestige - they want 'modern' cities. Authorities in Addis Abeba and Bamako banned horse carts, and those in Islamabad banned almost all intermediate means of transport. Some cities in India and Indonesia have banned cycle rickshaws. They have been replaced by more 'modern' autorickshaws. These motorised vehicles do not appear to have reduced traffic congestion but they have increased pollution. In urban areas the prohibition of slow vehicles has not automatically improved traffic flows, since traffic speed is often limited by vehicles stopping for loading and unloading. |